How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

For example, Jesus has a God …

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

Is the saying "nice guys finish last" true? Can good intentions always lead to positive outcomes?

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

Why do gun owners feel the need to defend themselves with deadly weapons? Can they not just talk things out like civilized people do?

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

Isn't it ironic people always talk about how much women hate Donald Trump, when almost any of them would marry him if they could? What he said in the 2005 Billy Bush video, almost every woman would share the sentiment if it got them his lifestyle.

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: